Wolves in sheep’s clothing rarely campaign against compassion. Often, they weaponize it. Christian voters should ask what kind of justice their promises really serve, Owen Anderson argues.

In my previous column, I asked why God permits the wicked to win elections. A reader responded: “Why do you ask this when James Talarico wins, but not when Trump wins?” He then listed what he considers Trump’s personal moral failings. The objection shifted the focus from policy to personality. The question became sharper when Ross Douthat asked President Trump whether he could forgive his enemies. Trump answered, “I probably cannot do that, no, because I do hate some of my enemies and I always will.” His remarks at Charlie Kirk’s memorial service had suggested as much. A Christian cannot simply dismiss that answer. But does it settle the question of how Christians should judge political leaders?

Some evils are worse than others.

Beware. You may remember when JD Vance stirred up the left by talking about the order of love. Love moves outward in concentric circles. We do not love everyone in the same way. We love our families and neighbors differently from complete strangers on the other side of the world. In a related way, there is an order of evil. Every sin deserves the wrath of God, both in this life and the next. Yet not all sins are equally grave. The Westminster Shorter Catechism, Question 83, says, “Some sins in themselves, and by reason of several aggravations, are more heinous in the sight of God than others.”

Source: The most dangerous evil can look remarkably like good | Blaze Media

In this is love, not that we loved God, but that He loved us and sent His Son to be the propitiation for our sins.
1 John 4:10

Something went wrong. Please refresh the page and/or try again.


Discover more from Drink of Jesus

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Drink of Jesus

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading